alt Hacker NewsI think you will find that 4K is generally sufficient at 32". Text is sharp enough, and a high refresh rate is probably more important at that point. There is also the issue that not even a 5090 can push enough fps at resolutions higher than 4K in demanding games.
Replies
skavi • yesterday at 5:38 PM
4k stretched to 32 is awful. screen door very visible. honestly it’s not even quite enough for 27.
spacedcowboy • yesterday at 5:44 PM
Oh to be young again. I use a 43" Samsung TV at 4K. That works for me. The 32" 4K monitor next to it I run at 2560x1440, you know, so I can read it...
➕ show 1 reply
yreg • yesterday at 10:38 PM
If you use a 27" 5K iMac its impossible to go to 32" at 4K. It looks terrible.
I have 4K at 32". It's pretty sharp but at 6K the pixels would be significantly less visible, and I could run it at an even 200% so that older programs don't have scaling issues.
And I don't need to run games at full resolution.
6K at 32" would be the same density as 5K at 27"