logoalt Hacker News

jeffbee • yesterday at 6:16 PM • 2 replies • view on HN

It isn't "fuckery" as such. There's just an industry of selling dossiers on individuals, groups, or populations that is way, way more intrusive than what people imagine about online advertising, and they have been doing it for decades. It's data on the open market.


Replies

JumpCrisscross • yesterday at 6:57 PM

> It isn't "fuckery" as such

§ 215 was fuckery. It was reformed [1]. (Though not repealed.)

> an industry of selling dossiers on individuals, groups, or populations

Agree. But buying reports from data brokers isn't "you scratch my back I'll scratch yours" agreement. That's fuckery again.

To be clear, I'm not denying fuckery is afoot. I'm criticising throwing it out there without an evidenced allegation. Because if we have evidence of fuckery, that’s the priority. If not, it’s the data brokers.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_Freedom_Act

the_doctah • yesterday at 6:26 PM

OK but you seem to imply that my live location data is being streamed to NSA-like orgs

➕ show 3 replies