logoalt Hacker News

nailer • yesterday at 6:40 PM • 2 replies • view on HN

This. If Wikipedia wanted to address something, they could look at issues like these - just from October:

- ADL report finds 91% of banned editor’s Israel-related edits still live on key pages. https://www.timesofisrael.com/biased-wikipedia-edits-on-isra...

- Forensic details of Oct. 7 atrocities (sexual violence, burned victims) removed and never restored on Gaza war page. https://www.adl.org/resources/press-release/adl-wikipedias-d...

- Editor JDiala admits 10-15% of active accounts since Oct. 7 were sockpuppets or Discord-coordinated for pro-Palestine bias. https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-911291

- Hamas page restructured days after Oct. 7 to move antisemitism and abuses material to low-traffic “Criticism” article. https://www.foxnews.com/media/first-fox-wikipedias-editorial...

- New cohort of 19 editors uses subtle methods (undoing, hedging, slow rewrites) and controls latest versions on ~60% of examined pages. https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitism/article-911852


Replies

slowin • yesterday at 8:35 PM

Israel (and the ADL) have both clearly stated that they're spending a lot of money and effort to put hasbara all over the internet, and try to train AI with it. Accurately reporting of Israel's genocide, land theft, ethnic cleansing, apartheid, spying and their many war crimes absolutely belong on Wikipedia. Zionist hasbara propaganda does not.

➕ show 1 reply