So all a company has to do is say "AI is necessary for the job" and the exemption no longer applies. Then why are we even having this discussion?
How would you possibly prove that AI is necessary for a job when someone has been doing the job successfully for years before AI?
Sounds like a tough argument to make to me
Because if neither side budges, it goes to court to figure out what's reasonable, like with any other dispute. This is pretty basic stuff.