The document in question specifically says it is a rushed translation of a German document, what's in dispute here exactly?
The claim that "else" is an archaic word and hence a bad/rushed translation.
On the contrary it's a normal everyday word that makes perfect grammatical sense in the given context.
The claim that "else" is an archaic word and hence a bad/rushed translation.
On the contrary it's a normal everyday word that makes perfect grammatical sense in the given context.