logoalt Hacker News

andix • last Thursday at 1:07 PM • 5 replies • view on HN

IPv6 got some real traction in the last decade. From around 10% adoption up to 50%. It's not dead, like many are claiming. It works fine, just keep implementing it.


Replies

throw0101c • last Thursday at 1:42 PM

> From around 10% adoption up to 50%.

Google sees 70-80% from some countries:

* https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=per-...

➕ show 3 replies
usui • last Thursday at 3:11 PM

I keep IPv4 off on a media computer all the time out of curiosity. IPv6-only is still unusable because only about 5% to 10% of top sites that I find during a Google Search work. It's almost guaranteed that a website will not load on all the top results.

So even if it's true 50% of clients support IPv6, only about 5% to 10% of website hosts do.

Sure a person can do a dual-stack setup or do some IPv4-IPv6 translation, but seriously IPv6-only should be plug-and-play by now.

➕ show 3 replies
idatum • last Thursday at 3:38 PM

And Windows 11 now supports CLAT.

commandersaki • last Thursday at 2:46 PM

But it's not really useful until it has critical mass at say 80 or 90%.

cyberax • last Thursday at 6:08 PM

IPv6 is dead. Nobody cares about it.

I will believe otherwise once even one US hotel chain supports it. I have _never_ seen a hotel in the US with IPv6 WiFi. Not once.

And I once stayed in a hotel (in Mountain View, CA) that gave out public IPv4 addresses.

➕ show 3 replies