logoalt Hacker News

rtkwe • yesterday at 6:17 PM • 3 replies • view on HN

Why? The goal is to incentivize property owners to fix broken systems not to pay for the actual cost of responding to a real call. That's covered by taxes.


Replies

chrisandchris • today at 8:05 AM

> [...] not to pay for the actual cost of responding to a real call.

Not true for all places. There are places where the callee can be charged for the costs of a call and the owner of the building has to pay the firefighters (well, his mandatory government-issued insurance will pay). It's moving bills from one stack to another, but it's not free as in beer.

ralegh • yesterday at 6:34 PM

Depending on who is paying and how much, someone might light a small fire to avoid the fine.

➕ show 1 reply
bell-cot • yesterday at 7:15 PM

I'd interpret the "minus first N per year" to mean that you get a few "free" fires per year - but after that your habits filling your closets with oily rags, overloading electrical extension cords, and smoking in bed will start to cost you.

➕ show 2 replies