logoalt Hacker News

NoidFonsense • yesterday at 9:59 PM • 8 replies • view on HN

If your crypto was stolen in this, it wasn't your crypto. It is simply cryptocurrency that has been reallocated from an exchange to a more competent party, as the free market intended.


Replies

nl • yesterday at 10:45 PM

I don't think the security trade-off for most people is clear here.

Given things like the ledger hardware attack[1] I think the time indexed risk of using a centralized exchange is probably lower than doing self-custody.

I understand that many people do self-custody for philosophical reasons, but I think trying to disguise this as a security decision ("If your crypto was stolen in this, it wasn't your crypto.") is arguable at best.

[1] https://www.ft.com/content/70f69253-6017-4259-95c9-48bf0e088...

➕ show 1 reply
ebiester • yesterday at 10:38 PM

So what happened with all of those with hardware wallets that have been pwned?

There apparently is no such thing as “your crypto” with how many security problems there are.

➕ show 6 replies
method_capital • yesterday at 10:10 PM

Code is law!

razodactyl • today at 12:07 AM

This is highly insensitive and highly logical. I am very conflicted.

cryptoegorophy • yesterday at 10:24 PM

not your keys not your coins...

➕ show 1 reply
skinfaxi • today at 12:10 AM

If someone steals your wallet, it wasn't your money, just the free market working as intended.

UltraSane • today at 2:19 AM

Controlling your own crypto keys is like having your net worth in cash or gold stored in your house. It could easily be lost or stolen or destroyed in a fire unless you take extraordinary precautions and then it is all gone.

➕ show 1 reply