logoalt Hacker News

jameson • today at 12:02 AM • 4 replies • view on HN

I find it odd that people put "decentralized" currency into a centralized wallet


Replies

berkes • today at 10:39 AM

If you want to exchange, that is buy or sell, you'll need such a "centralized" exchange. Same for trading.

So even those that keep their assets offline on an airgapped machine in a nuclear bunker, will occasionally move crypto assets on- and off these exchanges. And especially when you hold the crypto truly offline, it's a hassle to get it on- and off exchanges. So you'll probably keep several months worth of sales or buys before moving it.

Point being: even those that still believe in the "decentralized" currencies will have some of their assets on "centralized wallets", even if only for a short time.

And yes, I am aware that one can "decentralized" buy and sell for and to fiat. And yes, I am even aware that sometimes in some situations, one can even avoid exchanging to/from fiat to pay rent or gas. But that's far from practical and probably never attainable.

➕ show 1 reply
razemio • today at 5:58 AM

It is this time of the year again. I always write the same. HN is not regular people. For a high percentage, CEX wallets are the safer option. There are 1-10 topics of people who are not able to access their wallet anymore each day on r/bitcoin alone. There have been hardware wallets hacks on mass. On an exchange like kraken, coinbase, bitstamp or Binance there is a high chance you wont loose your money, even after a hack. You have apps that work out of the box to watch your investment. You can easily go back to fiat. Most of them now also support tax reporting.

bdcravens • today at 2:54 AM

Because no one cares about the nerdy stuff, they just want Lambos

Sopel • today at 1:49 AM

because crypto is just an excuse to speculate in an unregulated market