logoalt Hacker News

inglor • yesterday at 3:55 PM • 3 replies • view on HN

When I was at Microsoft we took security cripplingly seriously to the point we could not deliver features and our competitors could because the security process was convoluted and had multiple reviews and approval steps.


Replies

Veserv • yesterday at 4:15 PM

Having crippling bureaucracy does not correlate with good security outcomes, except maybe negatively. However, having a history of unending egregious security failures, like Microsoft, does correlate with poor security outcomes. For that matter, having a present of unending egregious security failures also correlates with poor security outcomes.

Let us look on the front page and see if there are any, oh look here is one: https://www.binarysecurity.no/posts/2026/10/one-root-case

➕ show 2 replies
tptacek • yesterday at 4:41 PM

Practically every software security firm in the country was a vendor to Microsoft in the mid-late oughts and I know the Microsoft you're speaking about, but the vibe I've got lately is that things are different there now.

loloquwowndueo • yesterday at 3:58 PM

Tell me you weren’t on the Windows team without telling me you weren’t on the windows team :)