logoalt Hacker News

jonathaneunice • yesterday at 7:48 PM • 11 replies • view on HN

I hope this is a real wake-up call for teams running anything remotely SaaS-shaped. I count at least six substantial, lightning-speed attacks against multi-tenant as-a-service vendors since September. Not this year--just since last month. PingCAP/TiDB, Fireworks AI, Zeabur, OpenCode Console, Railway, now Northflank. All of them modern "we keep your content safe" players with high hopes and probably pretty good protections.

This is a full infosec emergency unfolding here. No matter how grinding it is to motivate a team to invest in protection or resilience (and it is grinding): We gotta get ready. Stat! The AI-accelerated attacker apocalypse has begun. It's boom, boom, boom, thanks for everything, on to the next. They have us sighted and are firing for effect.

So credential rotation, tripwire secrets, DFIR on standby, solid vulnerability and intrusion detection, real listening to that signal, minimized blast radius, spending caps and time limits and tight scoping on credentials, fast incident alerting... We need to get on a real war footing here.


Replies

999900000999 • yesterday at 8:48 PM

War ?

Last I checked major companies are still outsourcing essential engineering to save a buck.

A bit old, but how was this practice ever acceptable.

https://www.propublica.org/article/defense-department-pentag...

A multi trillion dollar company( Microsoft) too cheap to hire onshore for DoD contracts.

➕ show 2 replies
pwarner • yesterday at 8:32 PM

I wonder what it's like inside the big cloud providers. I think outside Microsoft they've always been security first, but this new era has to be crazy town.

➕ show 2 replies
mlhpdx • yesterday at 9:00 PM

> All of them modern "we keep your content safe" players

But they weren’t and probably aren’t and won’t be. They just put forth an image as much as needed to sell.

➕ show 2 replies
roundup • today at 3:41 AM

Should startups that have experienced a data breach face a lower valuation in subsequent funding rounds?

blauditore • yesterday at 10:13 PM

I wonder which one of these are at least partially due to effortless vibecoding...

Also, if vulnerabilities are so easy to find, it should also be easy to detect them through a simple red team exercise.

0xbadcafebee • today at 12:00 AM

> probably pretty good protections

In my career I've seen maybe two companies have pretty good protections. Both had government contracts so they had no choice. Otherwise there's no reason for companies to secure their stack. They make money easier without it.

The buildings are on fire because they're being built out of straw because it's cheaper. Only a government regulation to build out of brick is going to stop the fires.

SubiculumCode • today at 12:28 AM

I for one have backed up to offline storage our research lab's data in preparation...

Den_VR • yesterday at 8:19 PM

A war footing?

➕ show 2 replies
therein • today at 2:40 AM

> SaaS-shaped

The usage of shape here triggers me.

➕ show 1 reply
adriand • yesterday at 11:24 PM

Maybe Bill Gates has a point when he says that models capable of significant cyberattacks need to run on controlled infrastructure. Is the era of open weight models you can strip safeguards from turning out to be so great? From my perspective, this kind of sucks.

➕ show 2 replies