logoalt Hacker News

dabinat • yesterday at 6:42 PM • 7 replies • view on HN

The danger is that we give good leaders too much power, and they’re then replaced by someone who abuses it. And that’s why we need to be careful how much power we give someone, even if we’re sure they will use it wisely.


Replies

xg15 • yesterday at 9:11 PM

I agree, but would like the same thought applied to the private sector. I read a lot of comments who are extremely critical of every bit of power a state assumes, but have no problem if a private company reaches a practical monopoly or gets access to every intimate detail of peoples' lives.

➕ show 2 replies
titzer • yesterday at 6:52 PM

Let's start with basic accountability, like swift and just punishment when those in power break the law.

➕ show 3 replies
ranger207 • yesterday at 7:21 PM

Yes, this is why my opinion is that in politics, the ends absolutely do not justify the means, because a broken system that produces the right answer is lucky, and a working system that produces the right answer is... working as intended

blagie • yesterday at 6:57 PM

The problem is more about how we pick whom we give power to.

➕ show 2 replies
vaadu • yesterday at 8:39 PM

Not just leaders, but government in general. Unelected bureaucracies can be just as dangerous.

And they are not our leaders, they are our representatives. Regarding them as leaders allows them to act as our betters. And another reason for term limits on Congress.

sleight42 • yesterday at 10:46 PM

I'll say it.

So, basically, Trump?

rnd0 • yesterday at 11:17 PM

hard times make good leaders, good leaders make soft times, soft times make bad leaders, bad leaders make hard times