logoalt Hacker News

InsidiousWombat • today at 4:16 PM • 5 replies • view on HN

Plain Debian was always best option; even RHEL dropped the ball on this CVE and that's distro people pay for support


Replies

thayne • today at 5:23 PM

Not always. Notably, if you have compliance requirements like needing FIPS encryption (say because you have government customers), or that requires you to use a commercial vendor, debian won't work. And if you need more up to date system packages, or a reliable release cadence, Ubuntu might be better.

On desktop, if you need proprietary drivers, Ubuntu is easier to set up.

But yes, if debian works for you, I wouldn't use Ubuntu.

➕ show 3 replies
pmontra • today at 7:12 PM

I planned to install Debian in 2009 and in 2014 but the installer was too hard to use, the desktop in 2009 was ugly (maybe in 2014 too), I could not get a running system that I could use to work. Fast forward to Debian 10, same laptop from 2014, and I got a desktop identical to Ubuntu GNOME.

bigfatkitten • today at 7:20 PM

Red Hat is always slow in backporting patches to their Frankenkernel.

noir_lord • today at 8:54 PM

[dead]

johnnyenn • today at 7:39 PM

[flagged]