alt Hacker Newsto spell it out: the implicit claim is "ai companies think ai is a scam, as evidenced by them using humans instead of ai", and I believe the huge internal ai use is evidence to the contrary
to spell it out: the implicit claim is "ai companies think ai is a scam, as evidenced by them using humans instead of ai", and I believe the huge internal ai use is evidence to the contrary
AI, the technology, can be useful... And... AI the investment case can be a scam.
These are not mutually exclusive points, and I find it a common issue to get both sides to understand.