logoalt Hacker News

zahlman • today at 7:00 PM • 4 replies • view on HN

> The problem is that these refrigerator cases are not as simple as your refrigerator at home. As a simple example, many systems allow you have control over the deadband: the exact low temperature at which the compressor turns off and the high temperature at which the compressor turns back on. You also have control over defrost cycles, compressor pressure and many other things (I worked with this a long while ago, and I don't remember all the details). … This is not something that a non-expert supermarket employee would be able to handle well.

I still don't see why the expert has to be remote, or why an integrated computer can't do the optimization. Or why it needs to be fiddled with at any significant frequency.


Replies

dotancohen • today at 8:15 PM

  > I still don't see why the expert has to be remote
Because there are 1000 store locations. You're either then paying for 1000 mostly idle engineers, or somebody not really qualified has to don that hat, or you're flying your engineers around constantly. Or just connect the devices to the Wild Wild Web and be done with it.
➕ show 1 reply
chromaton • today at 9:23 PM

> why it needs to be fiddled with at any significant frequency

Weather changes, equipment performs differently as it wears, changes in customer behavior, different items being stocked, electricity cost updates...

InexSquirrel • today at 8:05 PM

That's my thought too.

These fridges may need more complex control for a variety of reasons, but that doesn't mean they have to be connected to _the internet_. To a local network for control, sure.

Put your security measures into the network itself, but I really do feel fridges are another thing which do not need to be IoT devices.

➕ show 1 reply
chrisjj • today at 8:54 PM

> I still don't see why the expert has to be remote

Because then he can get paid more.