logoalt Hacker News

mlsu • today at 7:15 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

I wonder if this has to do with the aggressive RL that these models are undergoing. I'm basically a layman but it seems to me that:

- models are trained to improve on some task, e.g. 'improve at math puzzles' is commonly used.

- the best way to improve on some task is to have interpretability into your own neurons (..?)

- if your interpretability is good, you can improve faster - if you have insight into how your own neurons work and can improve them directly

- therefore, models naturally put effort into 'self-interpretability'

I wonder if this is part of the 'secret sauce' of what the labs are doing: giving models the ability to interpret their own weights in the RL loop. In my mind, this is the only explanation for how they could succeed at a task like this. How many blog posts are on the open internet that say "this is each weight of a neural network and what each one means"?


Replies

jnwatson • today at 7:18 PM

Without special effort, a model's reasoning layer doesn't have access to its own weights or activations anymore than we have access to what's going on with our own neurons.

➕ show 1 reply