logoalt Hacker News

rurifi33 • today at 7:17 AM • 2 replies • view on HN

In the 90s and early 2000s server uptime might be counted in multiple years and extremes in the decades

The industry can barely keep an npm update from breaking the world now.. and that’s build tools and environments and so it’s independent of “we use stable languages”

Now add the possibility of political sanctions on ISA licensing and you have -

Hardware that’s fails quicker and may not be available to buy, software that barely builds months later, and a world where the US president can sanction entities at will if they don’t comply…

Yeah, open source isn’t all that’s required


Replies

jurgenburgen • today at 1:11 PM

> In the 90s and early 2000s server uptime might be counted in multiple years and extremes in the decades

I know uptimes were a flex back in the day but now a long uptime is an indicator that maybe you’re treating your machine as a pet instead of cattle.

➕ show 1 reply
renszarv • today at 7:49 AM

I do remember a Freebsd 2.2 server, that after it's setup in 98, reached 800 days of uptime without any kernel upgrade, but the main reason for that, we were too afraid to do an upgrade, let alone a reboot, because if the server hadn't started, getting to it physically with a new boot CD, would have been a big issue. And that was the single server that the company had at that time, for a long time :)

➕ show 1 reply