Only in the same narrow way that a camera makes better art than a painter. Or the idea that a generic landscape print is better than a Rothko, because it looks more like other paintings that you like to look at.
How does an absurd comparison between two completely different genres make sense? Is Morbid Angel better than Lady Gaga because Morbid Angel sounds more like other music I like to listen to? Does this question make any sense to you?
The camera just records reality, its by definition sort of neutral artistically speaking, its what it records that matters. Its quite different from this AI music thing, and I would consider it a very difficult task to discuss topics with someone trying to pretend it isn't.