logoalt Hacker News

sneak • today at 12:14 PM • 3 replies • view on HN

The AI formula is out of the bag. The Manhattan Project is over, trinity has happened.

If it weren’t OAI and Anthropic, it would be others.

If it weren’t US companies, it would be others.

It is far too useful now to stop large scale deployment, it isn’t a matter of specific people or countries not being cautious or prudent enough. The entirety of the Earth is at issue now and there will always be people who cause the tragedy of the commons (if indeed AI turns out to be harmful in the long run, which is not remotely certain).

Look at what happened with fossil fuels. Even if the entire global west totally ceased use, there are many countries that simply will not stop because of local utility. AI is the exact same way.


Replies

233mhz • today at 12:19 PM

> If it weren’t US companies, it would be others.

There is something deeply rotten about the US mindset though, them being American is definitely a problem.

> Look at what happened with fossil fuels.

The west had a 100 years head start, on top of that these countries are producing everything you consume, don't start pointing fingers. Chinese current co2 per capita is the same as the US in 1900

➕ show 2 replies
HarHarVeryFunny • today at 1:44 PM

Yes, the cat is out of the bag as to how to create this type of AI.

But that doesn't mean that everyone has to use it.

We're only starting to see the beginning of the negative impact of AI to the job market and society. If if turns out that allowing most jobs to be replaced by AI is bad for society and the economy (super high unemployment - nobody buying more then necessities), then wouldn't it be smarter to not do that?

If that's the case, then each country can decide for themselves.

Dario's "Machines of loving grace" UBI/foodstamp "utopia" sure doesn't sound like a recipe for success.

➕ show 1 reply
customguy • today at 1:14 PM

> If it weren’t OAI and Anthropic, it would be others.

Doing what? Rushing to make trillion dollar companies, rather then developing the tech and their companies in a sustainable way? I don't even know what in the original comment this would be a response to.

➕ show 1 reply