Author here. Fair hits on the writing; I leaned on an LLM too heavily for the prose. The data and method are mine, and they're all in the repo. Happy to answer questions about how the extraction works.
It’s truly unbearable to read. I wouldn’t even know what to ask. Keep in mind the end result of a project like this is an entertaining and informative article about code history.
Thanks for being candid about it. LLM text usually is too verbose and unfocused to make it an entertaining reading. For me it would be better to listen to your opinions and ideas that to get a longer more refined prose by an LLM.