alt Hacker NewsDon't ignore the possibility Claude was trained on non-public documentation or code, perhaps even illicitly acquired. That doesn't make Claude any less useful, just not necessarily for the reasons you think.
Replies
locknitpicker • today at 7:02 AM
> Don't ignore the possibility Claude was trained on non-public documentation or code (...)
Do these wild "what if" even matter? I mean, what's your point? That it was trained in a way that it enabled this sort of task? That's like putting out a disclaimer that the water is wet.
➕ show 2 replies
mschuster91 • today at 10:32 AM
[dead]
I had this when I was working with E-Ink display. Claude was using OP Codes I had no knowledge of and there was no documentation of.
It worked flawlessly but lets be honest. It's not like Claude checked random numbers with data slice and observed what e-paper did