logoalt Hacker News

SideQuark • today at 2:19 AM • 3 replies • view on HN

Simply Google “is social media a publisher” and you’ll learn it is not, not even close, by any legal definition.

Therefore you could save all your other questions and statements.


Replies

toddmorey • today at 2:41 AM

OK, fine. But they are also an ad network, which absolutely acts as a publisher. I think they should be liable for the revenue they bring in from knowingly fraudulent ads.

Legal definitions can should change in order to keep up with society and technology.

➕ show 1 reply
erentz • today at 2:37 AM

You're just responding here by saying "by law they are not thing X" in response to people who are saying "maybe the law should be different because they sure act like thing X".

➕ show 1 reply
otterley • today at 3:54 AM

When social media chooses what to display in a user’s feed—even if the content is 3P generated— then it starts to look an awful lot like a publisher. Would you consider a newspaper not to be a publisher of its own op-Ed page? How about the old Reader’s Digest?

➕ show 1 reply