If you knowingly distribute something fraudulent you should be liable even if someone else is paying for it and you automated everything.
Ethically it's not much different than knowingly selling goods someone else stole.
> If you knowingly distribute something fraudulent you should be liable even if someone else is paying for it and you automated everything.
That's why they "automate" everything. So that they can claim no knowledge.
> If you knowingly distribute something fraudulent you should be liable even if someone else is paying for it and you automated everything.
That's why they "automate" everything. So that they can claim no knowledge.