logoalt Hacker News

colmmacc • today at 8:18 AM • 5 replies • view on HN

Salaries being a public record does come with some downsides for employees.

For the low-paid, it can make it even harder to get credit, or a place to rent, and it can be used for other kinds of discrimination. For the highly-paid, service providers and sales people can use the information to increase the prices you pay and make negotiation harder.


Replies

hawk_ • today at 8:37 AM

More transparency in a society is for the better. This shouldn't stop at salaries. Why aren't service providers required to disclose what they charge others? Why aren't dentists, lawyers, surgeons etc... required to report their stats? All of those would break information asymmetry and make for better decisions all around and less scams.

hdgvhicv • today at 9:08 AM

Credit isn’t a problem - your salary is already known as you provide bank statements etc. in the uk there are maximum rent:salary ratios for example.

Parasitical private equity firms maximising their prices is a reasonable worry.

em-bee • today at 9:04 AM

your bank already knows your salary, and if they don't they are going to ask for it as a condition to give you credit. in some countries landlords ask for proof of income too. the less regulated these areas, the more likely that is going to happen.

sehansen • today at 9:05 AM

In Scandinavia you need to provide salary information to get any kind of credit anyway.

badpun • today at 8:47 AM

Even better, grocery stores might make various discounts and promotions eligible based on whether you belong to a certain bottom percentile of income. That’s the holy grail of price discrimination („milk them for all they have”), which is now attempted to achieve only through imperfect means such as premium brands, up-sells etc.