> Before Meta bans an advertiser, its automated systems must peg the account as at least 95% likely to be running a scam, the documents say. Below that threshold, the suspected scammer simply pays more per ad and stays live.

Wait, what is their justification for charging you more for ad but not banning you? You are probably but not certainly a scammer, so we charge you more?

Is there something that makes this not what it appears from how OP described it, FB asking suspected scammers to increase the profit-share with meta?