logoalt Hacker News

VulgarExigency • today at 12:38 AM • 3 replies • view on HN

Deepseek claim they are earning 38 dollars per GPU hour on inference. If you compare Deepseek Flash's off-peak pricing with Sonnet at API rates, Deepseek is 16x cheaper per 1M output tokens, and 13x to 33x cheaper for input, depending on whether or not it's a cache hit. Inference is very profitable.


Replies

F7F7F7 • today at 12:49 AM

There are moments where I have a 2 hour , 4 instances in separate Kitty/Ghost windows , Opus 5.5 hammering away on each - and only see a 1% increase on my Max x20. Then there are other days where 10 minutes of a single xH Opus doing 1/10th of the work will kill 2%.

Anthropic is super opaque with what inference costs at any given moment on the subscription and cache is just super inconsistent.

➕ show 1 reply
csomar • today at 10:33 AM

A Claude/OpenAI sub is still cheaper than DeepSeek API pricing though. Also, I suspect Claude and OpenAI models to be way larger (probably in the 2-3T range) than that of Deep Seek.

etempleton • today at 1:25 AM

Again, if you ignore training.

That is like saying selling hamburgers is profitable if you exclude the cost of beef.

➕ show 2 replies