Why? "There is gravel in the food" is a perfectly valid contribution. You don't need to write a compelling story about it.

> Can we add a rule that if you blame someone for using AI, you _also_ have to bring something interesting to the table?

No.

I agree. One comment constructive is enough. It feels like some guys pushing the topic away.

It annoys me as it takes my attention with them so with all respect: user aharmetz (and others) please keep it in one post that you’d prefer non-AI text. Point.

Thank you.

I’d rather this over the very long tradition in this site if people bellyaching about site design and layout on otherwise u related comment threads

> Can we add a rule that if you blame someone for using AI, you _also_ have to bring something interesting to the table?

Criticism is a valid 'something interesting'. And growing numbers of us also don't want to feed the US mega-companies LLM training sets.

More and more people are keeping human-generated stuff to themselves, cause of that.