logoalt Hacker News

Hacking the meta ray-ban smartglasses

49 points • by moooooky • last Saturday at 5:19 PM • 15 comments • view on HN

Comments

RobMurray • today at 12:30 AM

It's really sad that getting a shell on a device you own is now considered a vulnerability.

➕ show 2 replies
mzajc • yesterday at 11:32 PM

This is a very neat and approachable write-up, but is the final result really a hack? If I understand correctly, you're getting an unprivileged shell on a device you own and have paired with your smartphone; more or less equivalent to installing a terminal emulator on your smartphone, except it's smart glasses in this case.

Should the ability to own one's devices really be treated as a vulnerability and reported to security teams?

➕ show 1 reply
malicka • today at 1:42 AM

Maybe I’ve still got the old PS3/PSP-exploit mentality, but reporting an arbitrary code execution vuln to the OEM is kind of sad… that deliberately closes a door for people to use their devices as they see fit.

Of course, the “don’t update after this firmware version” bit would always be the case (since any widely-distributed such vuln will be patched eventually), but deliberately moving the timeline to the left is sad.

frenchsalmon • today at 12:00 AM

Nice. How robust is this with software upgrades though? Also looks like arbitrary code execution in the app sandbox, so no persistance?