logoalt Hacker News

kgeist • yesterday at 9:41 PM • 2 replies • view on HN

It takes 116 seconds to process 43 input tokens and produce an answer to a very simple request (translation). That's pretty unusable, to be honest. Is overthinking a trait of DeepSeek, or it's a low quantization issue?

For comparison, the whole thing takes 1.8 sec on my RTX 6000 rig with GLM5.3-Flash, and 12.5 seconds on my RTX 5090 rig with Qwen 3.6 27b (it overthinks too, unlike GLM).

I can't imagine waiting 2 minutes for each small turn. It's like... 1 coding task per night? Sounds like, as an engineer, I can accomplish more in that time if I did everything myself manually without any AI.


Replies

cfn • today at 1:24 PM

Yes, Deepseek consumes a higher number of tokens per turn that comparable models (the latest Muse for example). This is just my experience, not a scientific study.

antirez • today at 8:47 AM

That's not the speed of the inference, but the fact that the default parameters are to max thinking. You can even disable thinking for many queries, or lower it to a smaller value.