logoalt Hacker News

lotsofpulp • today at 2:25 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

I could not access the article (or I did not want to pay), hence the question.

Given the celebrity status of Jensen, it seemed unlikely that scandalous photos of him would be publicly distributed and it not already have been a huge story.

It is possible the scandalous pictures (not just him walking in front of her or sitting next to her) were already floating around, and I am not up-to-date on celebrity scandals, and the wife was already planning a divorce, as you claim.

But without those photos, it could be the wife is finding out about the affair just now.

I still have not seen the pictures you are referring to, but I’m not that interested to look for them either.


Replies

caminante • today at 2:34 PM

> I could not access the article (or I did not want to pay), hence the question.

> I still have not seen the pictures you are referring to, but I’m not that interested to look for them either.

I figured you were acting in bad faith because the article addressed your question and you didn't mention you skipped the article.

Not mentioning is categorical bad faith-- another HN guidelines faux pas. Then, you double down with "not interested."

Please don't be toxic to others, too.