logoalt Hacker News

kif • today at 7:21 PM • 6 replies • view on HN

I used to be skeptical of nerfing, but as of a week or so ago I've noticed a severe degradation of quality for GPT Astra. It struggled with very simple tasks, and it often failed to follow my instructions.


Replies

margalabargala • today at 7:34 PM

I hear a lot of accusations of nerfing as in, saying that the model itself has been quantized.

I doubt this is the case. I suspect all variation in quality and output can be explained in terms of prompt differences, and changing how much thinking happens at each level, as we see in the post above.

rubicon33 • today at 8:09 PM

YES. To the point that I literally stopped using it, and have moved BACK to Claud.

This is getting ridiculous. The number of times I have switched from one model back to the other is crazy. I do not have any proof, so its quite possible I'm just delusional. AI psychosis? Either way, it FEELS like these models work really well for a while and then fall off. Switching to the latest model on the competitor always seems better, until it too seems to taper off. By then, a new model is usually available at the competitor, so I switch.

Its possible there's no degradation at all and just a PERCEPTION of it. But to me the end user, it really doesn't matter.

Foobar8568 • today at 7:38 PM

Both Astra and Opus didn't really looked good for the last week or two.

redox99 • today at 7:23 PM

GPT Astra felt nerfed just days after it launched.

redanddead • today at 7:29 PM

why were you skeptical of other users?

➕ show 1 reply
tamimio • today at 7:40 PM

Sol been really bad in some basic stuff that I would remove it from frontier models entirely