alt Hacker NewsI didn't posit a test. The previous posts discuss [women's] bodily autonomy, so either one can assume women should always have bodily autonomy, or the other option which is women sometimes do not have bodily autonomy.
>You have to address if the thing inside the tummy is a person or not, and when.
As an aside, the data overwhelmingly shows neither women nor doctors are choosing to abort viable fetuses willy nilly. The real world effect is, as the data shows, to cause doctors to think about their financial and criminal liabilities before their patients' well being.
https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2019/04/raw-data-abor...
>so either one can assume women should always have bodily autonomy, or the other option which is women sometimes do not have bodily autonomy
Framing it as a question of women's bodily autonomy assumes there is only one person involved, which is exactly what abortion opponents dispute. So your framing doesn't settle the issue.
The crux of the issue is if and when the thing in the tummy is a person.