alt Hacker News> You don't seem to have understood my comment very well.
> But I don't know.
Yes, I understood your comment perfectly. You literally don't know if any of it's findings are even helpful or not. So what are people supposed to take away from that?
> You don't seem to have understood my comment very well.
> But I don't know.
Yes, I understood your comment perfectly. You literally don't know if any of it's findings are even helpful or not. So what are people supposed to take away from that?
You said, "Your first impression is that you have no clue if any of its findings actually mean anything because you can't even understand them [...]".
I do in fact understand the findings, as I already clarified in the comment you just clicked "reply" on, and nothing in my original comment suggests that I don't, so you evidently misread it. There's no shame in admitting that. People make mistakes all the time. The shame is in refusing to correct them.
I'll have firmer information once the model has been out for more than 24 hours. But I think my experience report is already firm enough to be useful. I guess the other 8 people who upvoted it think so too. It's okay with me if it isn't useful to you. No information is useful to everyone.