logoalt Hacker News

microtonal • today at 1:46 PM • 4 replies • view on HN

Smartphones started in a very different time. Our point of reference were PCs and laptops, where we were the owner and could do pretty much anything we want. They took a lot of that away with smartphones, but because smartphones started in the in-between times, they (at least Android) still have side-loading, the possibility of installing browsers with ad blockers, heck even the source code in the form of AOSP, etc.

You can be sure that almost twenty years later, they will use a new device type as an excuse to lock things further down. Remote attestation, no side-loading, no or little browser competition, etc. This has kind of already happened with smart watches, where there is no AOSP-equivalent, virtually no models with unlockable bootloaders, etc.

AR glasses will be the next venue to further trample on your rights. The difference compared to smart watches is that they could potentially replace smartphones.

All this is without taking into account the grave privacy violation AR glasses are to other people. Yes, phones can also make photos and film, but it is much more visible.

Luckily, at least where I live, most people find AR glasses creepy and there is a majority of parliament that wants to ban them (though the government is kinda weak as usual).


Replies

cesarb • today at 2:22 PM

The main problem with smartphones is not that they started at an "in-between" time, but that they started in an "in-between" place as a hybrid of a PDA and a traditional cell phone. Cell phones tended to be very closed in large part due to the influence of traditional phone companies, which wanted control over every device plugged into the phone network, and smartphones inherited some of that.

Unfortunately, new devices tend to inherit from smartphones instead of desktop computers; even VR devices like the Steam Frame are clearly based on smartphone hardware, even though it doesn't have (for now) a cell phone modem.

jayd16 • today at 3:04 PM

Currently AR headsets are all just mobile platforms with exotic UX. If they could lock down AR glasses why wouldn't they do it with smartphones?

If anything the current set of HMDs are more capable and open than the average phone. What's special about the headsets that make them easier to lock down?

ranger_danger • today at 3:04 PM

[flagged]

majorchord • today at 2:07 PM

You're right, we should stop innovating entirely, because bad people and slippery slope fallacies exist in the world.

...sorry but that ain't happening.

➕ show 3 replies