logoalt Hacker News

grvdrm • today at 2:28 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

I think a one-shot (if that's what you're suggesting) clone is somewhat unrealistic. I agree with you.

On the other hand, refining/tweaking over time may get you closer. I'm quite far down this road, having created a DAW of my own flavor.

It's absolutely not perfect, nor is it a production-level app or even clone, but I trust it for electronic music production because it, like many other programs, does the basics well.

That's another point worth making about the assets. They're a barrier as someone builds them over time. You might have 2000 (example) custom presets and audio file alterations in Ableton and use them as your "sound" as a producer.

Thinking names like Kaskade, Deadmau5, etc. Plenty of others.

Going back to the code, reverb is the example that illuminates the difficulty of cloning in my day-to-day. Sometimes quite explicit in songs, and sometimes hiding just enough in the background. But IMO - stands out immediately when it sounds "off" as I lack a better description.

Anyhow, here's my song from my DAW in case you're curious! Note that it's not mastered so you'll need to crank your volume somewhat.

https://on.soundcloud.com/grJ3e8EAzMc87pFzLX


Replies

diskzero • today at 3:07 PM

The main argument to me in creating your own DAW is that you have some workflow that simply can't be done with the other tools. Otherwise, you are going to spend massive amounts of time just to replicate Ableton 1.0, let alone Live 13.

Thanks for sharing the song. This is material proof that your program can generate a composition. Did you come up with some new ideas about how to create and produce?

➕ show 1 reply