logoalt Hacker News

aborsy • today at 12:32 AM • 1 reply • view on HN

In your implementation, you wrote software that listens to public internet, takes as input websocket traffic and outputs UDP. Right there, there is potential for vulnerabilities and code execution. This piece has nothing to do with software that would next process UDP.

That's why wireguard over TCP is not as secure as wireguard UDP.


Replies

tptacek • today at 12:38 AM

This makes no sense. It's marginally less safe to accept UDP packets than TCP packets, for which you at least need to complete a 3WH to deliver frames. I don't think you've thought this through.

➕ show 1 reply