logoalt Hacker News

Aboutplants • yesterday at 1:31 PM • 3 replies • view on HN

He asked authorities, as stated in the article

“INAH replied: they checked their records and found no registered archaeological site at that location. To be clear, it's not official yet. But as far as anyone can tell, nobody had put this one on a map before.“

Am I missing something to your post?


Replies

ideashower • yesterday at 2:38 PM

There are other authorities! Such as researchers, academics etc.

See: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50453616

edh649 • yesterday at 1:45 PM

INAH said there's nothing registered there, nothing more than that. The results look fairly convincing but neither the OP, me and (I presume) you nor the commentor have archaeology experience. Perhaps there are other explanations for ground structures like this we just don't know till an expert visits the site and confirms that yes, it is a previously unmapped Mayan pyramid.

shawabawa3 • yesterday at 1:48 PM

One potential reason there's no registered archaeological site at that location is that there _is_ no archaeological site at that location.

For example, the agents could have displaced a known archeological site, or hallucinated or otherwise created one where none exists

➕ show 1 reply