So now this apparently amazing feat that was rushed into publication is actually just an out of date DB.
Peer review also protects the authors for making a fool of themselves. QED.
Perhaps you should get your comments peer reviewed then? Because between you and the author, only one of you made a fool of themselves, and I quite enjoyed the article.
Looks like it was peer (or rather superior) reviewed. I don't think the author was trying to be malicious and just wanted to blog about something cool they found.