alt Hacker NewsNo, that's the point, we wouldn't. And if we would then we should not be in charge of an extremely large organisation.
Part of the point of all this is that he's supposed to be in control of his emotions and able to make the best decisions without letting his emotions interfere.
If he can't even make the very simple decision to keep his dick in his pants in this very clear breach of commitments he has publicly made, then what other terrible decisions is he making? What other commitments will he break because it feels good and he can't control himself?
Replies
> he's supposed to be in control of his emotions and able to make the best decisions without letting his emotions interfere.
I agree but that ship sailed a long time ago and this action is being blown out of proportion.
Look at the president of the US that is a guy who has to go (and all the people around him) and is still in office.
Quite frankly he has had an affair with consenting adult women not trafficked children why are the knives out for him when this is all he has done?
Plenty of leaders throughout the years, most notoriously royalty (leaders in an "extremely large organization" if there ever was one), have been doing this.
I'll believe you when you're a powerful billionaire and you don't get caught.
You seem to imply there is a performance aspect here. Yet there are high performing people in all fields do this. Something like 20% of men have committed adultery.