logoalt Hacker News

Grombobulous • today at 4:54 AM • 1 reply • view on HN

You found two bad travel agents, I’ve found more than two bad/hallucinated outputs from LLMs.

I think that the AI travel industry will basically end up not giving you the best options compared to manual simply because steering you one direction or another is so valuable. I.e., AI will sell “sponsored listings” and your AI will book you at those places because you don’t care.

Or the travel providers who don’t want to pay AI firms money will not be booking options, like how Southwest Airlines wasn’t in Google for so long.

The nice part about travel agents is how they’re humans so they have brains and can work around any situation like that. That’s also why booking manually can beat AI.

If you’re traveling to have leisure or exploration, having a prediction engine choose the same probabilistic winner each time is going to end up being a negative aspect. You’ll say “I want a great trip to NYC” and you’ll end up going to Times Square like everyone else because the AI knows that most people go there.


Replies

FireBeyond • today at 5:52 AM

I have zero comments about the usefulness of AI travel agents. Indeed I tend to agree.

And of course, yes, there are good travel agents and as I described circumstances where they are a useful resource.

But in a world of aggregators and other things, many travel agents are just middle men.

Blaming AI for “destroying another middle class profession” ignores years of decline bringing us here. Might it be the final nail in the coffin? Maybe. But AI can’t really wear the guilt on the demise.

➕ show 1 reply