> The point I'm making is if there was a vaguely serious security risk the security services would have told the CEO
Where is the evidence that nobody in the security services did not know ? There is already history where Security services are not independent, and stuff that will be investigated depends on the current gouverement, what the timing of the leak seems to suggest.
Think about it - after over a year of investigation the strongest thing you can say about Alice Huang is/was a 'suspected' spy - which is a phrase you can use about anything - I suspect you - therefore you are 'suspected'.
Wake me up when that changes to actual spying.
Also turns out this wasn't the only affair the CEO had and it's not suggested the other woman was a spy.