logoalt Hacker News

vander_elst • yesterday at 6:41 PM • 8 replies • view on HN

Can anyone understand the logic behind the names? Argon, hydrogen, carbon, what is the mental model one should use to understand where they fit, or what comes before/after?

Haiku, sonnet, opus.. is ok

terra, Luna, Sol... is also ok..

but this?


Replies

aoeusnth1 • yesterday at 8:08 PM

They started out alphabetical for their pro releases: argon, barium (never released), carbon

Then they needed a flash model so they picked the lightest element.

➕ show 1 reply
motoboi • yesterday at 7:07 PM

The higher the atomic mass, the higher the intelligence.

➕ show 1 reply
forgotpwd16 • yesterday at 6:54 PM

H lightest (highest speed), Ar stabilizer (balanced), C structural bonds (highest reasoning)?

➕ show 1 reply
mda • yesterday at 7:31 PM

Carbon > Argon > Hydrogen not that hard?

anentropic • yesterday at 7:04 PM

Also... Argon and Carbon are the same price, but Carbon is better I guess?

And "Hydrogen surpasses Argon on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at its default high thinking level"

Given it's twice the price of 3.8 Flash I hope they would find room for another cheaper tier, but the Hydrogen name suggests not.

I'm glad Google are coming out with some decent models but it's a slightly confusing line up.

layoric • yesterday at 9:58 PM

Always rely on Google to mess up product launches

resolutefunctor • yesterday at 8:00 PM

They are all terribly named, but Gemini models definitely take the cake right now.

krisroadruck • yesterday at 6:47 PM

My guess, by atomic weight. Hydrogen = "sonnet". Carbon = "opus". Argon = "Fable" only argon 4 just happens to be kinda shit? But also it's google so who the hell knows. They could be just going alphabetical argon, then carbon, then hydrogen as release order follows the alphabet. That'd be kinda dumb but so is their access/subscription strategy so it'd be on brand.

➕ show 2 replies