logoalt Hacker News

0x1ch • yesterday at 6:49 PM • 3 replies • view on HN

I'd actually feel pretty safe with a LLM project if spec'd against the protocol documentation as opposed to a rookie's handcoded implementation. If security is the concern, I don't think using random reimplements is very safe to begin with.

Replies

Bender • yesterday at 11:22 PM

I'd actually feel pretty safe with a LLM project

Same. I had a couple LLM's rewrite, harden an anonymous image board. It's not popular but exposed to the internet and the Tor network. Not worried at all. Same with an SSH Chat server that is also listening on the Tor network.

    chat() ( saved=$(stty -g 2>/dev/null); trap 'stty "$saved" 2>/dev/null; printf "\033[?2004l\033[0m\033[?25h\033>"' EXIT INT HUP TERM
     [ -f /tmp/dc ] || ssh-keygen -qt ed25519 -f /tmp/dc -N ''; ssh -p 443 -i /tmp/dc -oIdentitiesOnly=yes [email protected] );
Evil hackers are welcome to hack around on it. Change "anon" to any nickname.
jayd16 • yesterday at 11:36 PM

This is a false choice. You can pick neither and for all you know you're picking both.

rootnod3 • yesterday at 6:54 PM

Unless the model changes and messes half the code base on next iteration. Or Anthropic decides to A/B test your agent.

Or when shit goes sideways and someone actually needs to take a human look at the BF s. I’d rather have the guy who manually with human eyes read the specs.