logoalt Hacker News

altruios • yesterday at 8:24 PM • 2 replies • view on HN

no, by your proposed definitions, an error occurs: pixel exact identical images, byte for byte, yet one is art and one is not based on 'how' it was created. This is nonsense.


Replies

calfuris • yesterday at 9:31 PM

Is it? This distinction already occurs in law: a sequence of bytes might be illegal, or it might not, depending on how you obtained it. Humans observe distinctions that computers do not.

slg • yesterday at 8:52 PM

>This is nonsense.

If you find yourself wanting to say this in the future, maybe give the other person some benefit of the doubt and take it as a sign to reassess your interpretation of what was said. I truly have no idea how you got to where you did from what I wrote, so I don't even know where to start to dispute it.

➕ show 1 reply