logoalt Hacker News

proxyscore • yesterday at 10:55 PM • 8 replies • view on HN

This changes nothing, in space fuel transfer between ships is the make it or break it.


Replies

modeless • yesterday at 10:59 PM

Fuel transfer seems like a trivial problem next to the reusable heat shield. And even if for some weird reason it never works, the program could likely pay for itself just launching Starlink/Starshield with full reuse.

➕ show 2 replies
motionlessveloc • yesterday at 11:13 PM

Only for going to the Moon or Mars. As a launch system, Starship will still be a phenomenal success even if they struggle with fuel transfer, which is really an entirely different problem.

Tepix • yesterday at 11:02 PM

Fuel transfer isn't needed to launch to LEO at much lower cost.

➕ show 1 reply
lfuller • yesterday at 10:57 PM

Even without enabling missions requiring refuelling this is still a huge step change in orbital capabilities.

matheusmoreira • yesterday at 11:18 PM

Orbital refueling seems like a small problem compared to a reusable starship.

ericcumbee • yesterday at 11:01 PM

plenty of use cases were fuel transfer is not needed.

small_model • yesterday at 11:20 PM

No really it can now launch 20x the Starlinks per flight and StarMind is possible now economically.

kortilla • yesterday at 11:31 PM

It changes cost to put up satellites, which is very significant.

It might not change much for mars