logoalt Hacker News

mk_stjames • yesterday at 11:57 PM • 4 replies • view on HN

The Space Shuttle took 2 people into orbit on its first launch and returned them safely to earth. On the first attempt. On the first test of any of the hardware into space. In 1981.

Starship did not and has not done that and until it does I will continue to hold reservations.

I do not see this Starship and its mission profile ever being a human-rated system in this incarnation, ever.

A really cheap way to launch mass into LEO? Sure, I'll give it that.


Replies

nsoonhui • yesterday at 11:59 PM

> I do not see this Starship and its mission profile ever being a human-rated system in this incarnation, ever.

May I know why ? And if the feat was done by NASA or China, would you change your conclusion?

➕ show 3 replies
GMoromisato • today at 12:09 AM

Huh? Space shuttle killed 14 astronauts. It was a flawed design from the beginning and never delivered on its original promise.

Starship has its own design trade-offs, as any engineered object does, but it has the benefit of 50 years of technological development since Shuttle.

I'm not as certain as you about whether or not Starship will ever be human rated. But if successful, it will be launching a couple of hundred times per year. Talk to me in five years and we'll see where we are then.

➕ show 1 reply
Quarrelsome • today at 12:14 AM

isn't the whole "we put a human into space" symbolic anyway? There's no air up there. If we had a full supply chain of robots that brought us back regolith from the moon wouldn't that be more useful than being able to send a person up there?

➕ show 1 reply
xixixao • today at 12:11 AM

How is incremental development and testing related to human-rated flight?

As is, your comment has a bold claim backed by seemingly unrelated fact.

➕ show 1 reply