logoalt Hacker News

bluefirebrandyesterday at 6:48 PM2 repliesview on HN

It is going to take a long time and a lot of resources no matter what so maybe we should be building effective longterm solutions like nuclear instead of stopgap solar and batteries


Replies

yellowappleyesterday at 6:54 PM

Not even “instead”. We need all of the above: nuclear for base loads, solar for peak loads, batteries for surplus capture.

show 2 replies
RandomLensmanyesterday at 6:52 PM

Why would, e.g., solar and chemical or physical storage be a stopgap? Why spend 20 years of building a fission reactor these days (other than for research, medical, or defense purposes) which also make awful targets in a conflict? Maybe just wait till fusion reactors are there.

show 2 replies