The article discusses all of that, in great detail.
The title does not seem sensationalized. It's literally a summary of the article.
That's exactly why the article's title is sensationalized.
The title is refuting a strawman argument that wasn't actually made, and that the article itself doesn't claim was made.
That's exactly why the article's title is sensationalized.
The title is refuting a strawman argument that wasn't actually made, and that the article itself doesn't claim was made.