logoalt Hacker News

petefordelast Tuesday at 5:09 PM11 repliesview on HN

I've been patiently waiting for this to drop for ~5 years, and I was hoping that it would somehow be under $1000.

Oh my god. $4400 is... a lot of money. $175 shipping had better include a Jeff Bridges Cameo video.

Don't get me wrong: I suspect that he's spent millions of dollars getting the project to this point, and that it's a mechanically perfect instrument. Huge respect for caring this much and seeing the project through.

But damn.


Replies

fallinditchtoday at 11:37 AM

You can get a new panoramic film camera for $69 - the Sprocket Rocket [1]. It makes images with grungy lomography charm - edges are soft but center is surprisingly sharp for a plastic lens. I really like the look of the images it produces. It has a hot shoe and a bulb setting.

[1] https://shop.lomography.com/us/sprocket-rocket-35-mm-film-pa...

show 1 reply
marssaxmantoday at 12:47 AM

I feel better now about the $700 I spent buying a 35mm panoramic film back for my medium-format Bronica SQA. It seemed like a real splurge at the time, but for the price of this new camera, you could get a whole Bronica system - including four or five lenses, an alternate viewfinder, a couple of 120 backs, and the panoramic film back - with enough left over for a year's worth of film and processing.

People must really like that swing-lens effect. It's not for me, but I imagine that this camera must seem much more compelling if it's what you're after.

> Huge respect for caring this much and seeing the project through.

Second that: product development is hard, and manufacturing is really expensive in small quantities.

show 1 reply
Sam6latetoday at 3:03 AM

I saw an old Soviet-era model that was working and seemed similar to this one, it was bought by my photography instructor, he showed me his weird collection. It used to be attached to the underside of spy airplanes to take panoramic pictures not just satellite imagery and earth maps. Maybe you should look for swing-lens cameras on the used/vintage market today. Look for Horizon line from KMZ, their later models continued under Russian production rather than being brand-new Soviet stock.

spaqintoday at 1:15 AM

I kind of expected that pricing - although even worse, in Europe, after VAT, it reaches $6000. Yeah it's not for me, and 350 units is probably capturing the whole target audience at this price.

The good part that could come out from it I would hope for would be new parts for old cameras. I managed to snag a Widelux F6 for about $800 last year that would need some servicing - sometimes it suffers from the infamous banding...

_doctor_loveyesterday at 9:24 PM

Just because we're film enthusiasts doesn't make us SAPS!

show 3 replies
kyleblarsontoday at 1:29 AM

That's just like, your opinion, man.

armadsenlast Tuesday at 5:49 PM

Yeah, I've been waiting for it for years too. I thought it was going to be substantially more than $4400 (more like $6-7K). Under $1,000 is unfortunately simply impossible. Used Wideluxes go for a fair bit more than $1K.

That said, too much for me right now. Maybe someday.

show 1 reply
fnord77today at 2:09 AM

Cheaper than Leica

show 1 reply
keyletoday at 12:31 AM

That is bonkers pricing. There is no way they actually expect a sell out with this price.

show 3 replies
dg247today at 7:49 AM

[dead]

joe_mambayesterday at 9:45 PM

>and I was hoping that it would somehow be under $1000.

Does this product have iPhone levels of sweatshop manufacturing and economies of scale, that such a price point would be realistic to you?

From what I know, the price is exactly where low-volume hand-made artisanal hardware is in the west, especially given the supply chain geopolitical challenges Trump caused.

I fact, the value for such a niche boutique engineered product seems pretty decent. Just look how much Swiss watches cost.

show 1 reply