But if there is no person on the other end, why should I care?
There are countless people "on the other end" --- everyone who contributed training data, and of course the one who prompted the AI to generate the result. It's odd that this debate always ends up with one side thinking there's a machine autonomously generating music, when in fact AI-generated music comes from humans using AI to create what they want.
People on both sides (which of course are not monoliths) are liable to imply that the AI was the artist.
Really what you get is a sort of conceptual art.
Suppose I ask my tattoo artist for a dragon. Would you agree that I created the tattoo?
If not, why then would asking the AI qualify as creation?